"As long as he looks and behaves like GrandPa Howard " they said before the last election,,, and we know how effective that was . . These dills failure to give Costello a go, means they should go . Their tired and uninspired cynicism means they should go.
. The liberal party is, at its best , a party that promotes idealism (and realism in context ) At both fed and vic level it shows precious little of that at the moment . Labor won and Labor are still winning on the idealism front .
No doubt it will take a shake inside to stop them from trying to hide the heavy hammer inside the kid glove .
Our society is indeed in need and , I think , somewhat ready for a hammer - but maybe only one they can see . They can't see Labors , but neither can Labor.
Will the libs take the opportunity to speak tough and be tough where it matters ?
See its not the tough image that matters, but the tough mind
Its no use voting in another strong man to lead when he doesn't have a strong mind to guide him .
Hewsons celebration of Turnbull is a example of the Libs current stalemate (as is Turnbulls final speech ). Full of "me, I in the kid glove of we" and little real understanding of the needs of the party - let alone the people.
Does the lib party have some straight up strongs? ( Hewsons taunt yesterday ) gotta have ;
The party machine have just gotta give up on the idea that he must look good and sound tough every time he talks . If libs lose at the next election it will be because they would rather look well dressed and stay smartly cynical than show blatant courage and credible control in dealing with the woosiness and misinvestment that explodes before us .
Joyce will not go away . |His cries for more than location location concentration by the libs will echo like bombs in their ears, if nothing is done to address them.
Who do we hate most?. Someone who knows what they should do and doesn't do it . or some party who doesn't even know what its doing?
